Sunday, May 3, 2009

reproductive justice

Being a white middle class female I can’t understand what it would feel like to be denied the ability to give birth, be a mother and raise a child. It seems like a universal experience that most women have the ability to share. The truth is that in many countries and societies this natural right is denied to certain groups. Eugenics is the extreme form of limiting certain group’s ability to procreate. In happens in subtler terms in the United States. Compulsorily sterilization is not a public policy like has been in the past. Controlling who has the ability to reproduce and who doesn’t is just another way that WASP patriarchy enforces its power. Society wants to make more babies that fit into the cultural norms. Black women, illiterate women, Hispanic women, poor women, drug addict women, lesbian women. All of these women do not enjoy the privilege that white middle class heterosexual women have; even the natural ability to be a mother. The language that the welfare policy was written in reveals that our society’s problems lie within the moral fabric of this country. Morals start with families. Pushing for family values is a huge issue with the conservative right. TANF was written so that heterosexual monogamous marriages would be the norm and therefore the ones to receive help from the government. Through welfare black women, Hispanic women, illiterate women, single mothers have all been singled out. They are not viewed as legitimate mothers who will instill the moral convictions of the conservative right on their children. Therefore they have been denied the access to their motherhood and even dissuaded from having children. In terms of other reproductive rights these women are called killers for having an abortion. They are called irresponsible. They are sent to jail. This would never happen to white middle class women. The fact that homosexual parents are looked down upon; that welfare says children in single parent homes will have problems; that Hispanic women are stereotyped as having too many babies to take care of; these are all indicators that our society has a narrow view of what is ok in terms of morals; of who is a legitimate mother.

1 comment:

  1. Hmm, as a "white middle class female", I bet you profit a lot from reproductive rights and other liberal policy paid by the Welfare State. However—I'm sorry to disappoint you—poor women—in particular, those from minorities—do not seem te be receptive to "consciousness raising" and other feminist activism, so they don't embrace abortion and similar "anti-patriarchal" policy, nor engage in responsible family planning. (In fact, they even support cultural practices which are "patriarchal" in nature, as in the case of poor "Hispanic" women get pregnant by a father who disappears afterwards.)

    As a result, only the middle classes profit from most left-liberal policy: poor women still worsen their economic condition by having 7-8 babies. If any middle class family had 7-8 children, it would probably descend to the lower social strata.

    Who pays for this? Responsible tax-payers (even people form the middle classes) who oft have no more than 3 children b/c they care not to externalize their family costs to the rest of society.

    I think a "legitimate mother" is that who can support the upbringing of her children, without forcing others to do so. One, two, three, right. But if a poor woman wants to have more children, I see no moral objection in her being asked by the Welfare State to be put an IUD or sterilized. After all, this "restriction" of her choice over her body is just as legitimate as that imposed upon tax payers, who will in turn be coerced to use their bodies to create wealth so gov't could have resources to support public services aimed at poor children.

    Regards,

    PIC

    ReplyDelete